Shot on film · Canon FX (1964) · Kodak ColorPlus 200

Sepang South Africa, on one roll of film

No autofocus, no screen, no second chances. You wind it on, you guess, and you find out weeks later.

Would you still shoot film in 2026?

This is a Canon FX. Canon put it on sale in April 1964, thirty-five years before I was born. It has a light meter on top that you read yourself, a shutter that tops out at 1/1000, and nothing that tells you whether you got the shot.

I took it to Sepang South Africa, about the most ridiculous place in Selangor. Eroded rock spires, orange cliffs, white ground that throws light straight back up at you. On a phone it looks like Malaysia. On film it doesn't look like anywhere.

Camera
Canon FX, 1964
Film
Kodak ColorPlus 200
Place
Sepang South Africa, Selangor
Scans back
38 frames

The roll

Straight from the lab scan. Frames shot upright are turned the right way; nothing else is edited.

FR 19
FR 21
FR 20
FR 24
FR 25
FR 23
FR 22
FR 29
FR 26
FR 27
FR 31
FR 35
FR 28
FR 36

Planes over the spires

Stand still long enough out there and a plane crosses the frame. Behind the rocks it's oil palm and low buildings on the horizon, which is the part a phone photo never lets you forget. Film softens it into something older.

FR 30
FR 34
FR 32
FR 33

The frames that didn't make it

Honestly, some came back badly. Underexposed, soft, one almost completely blank. That's the trade: thirty-six attempts, no preview, and the ones that work feel earned in a way a burst of four hundred digital shots never does.

FR 01
FR 02
FR 05
FR 18

The drive there and back

FR 09
FR 37
FR 38

So, would you? Film or phone for a place like this.