Would you still shoot film in 2026?
This is a Canon FX. Canon put it on sale in April 1964, thirty-five years before I was born. It has a light meter on top that you read yourself, a shutter that tops out at 1/1000, and nothing that tells you whether you got the shot.
I took it to Sepang South Africa, about the most ridiculous place in Selangor. Eroded rock spires, orange cliffs, white ground that throws light straight back up at you. On a phone it looks like Malaysia. On film it doesn't look like anywhere.
- Camera
- Canon FX, 1964
- Film
- Kodak ColorPlus 200
- Place
- Sepang South Africa, Selangor
- Scans back
- 38 frames
The roll
Straight from the lab scan. Frames shot upright are turned the right way; nothing else is edited.
Planes over the spires
Stand still long enough out there and a plane crosses the frame. Behind the rocks it's oil palm and low buildings on the horizon, which is the part a phone photo never lets you forget. Film softens it into something older.
The frames that didn't make it
Honestly, some came back badly. Underexposed, soft, one almost completely blank. That's the trade: thirty-six attempts, no preview, and the ones that work feel earned in a way a burst of four hundred digital shots never does.
The drive there and back
So, would you? Film or phone for a place like this.